Friends
Recent Messages
|
Dani3l3:
you need to implement BLOCK lists for users first of all, I would say...
replies (1) |
|
|
Dani3l3:
congratulations for the release!
|
|
shanselman:
yay!
|
|
|
Dani3l3:
gotta love the "friends of friends" feature!!!
|
|
|
Dani3l3:
goodnight yonkly, goodnight twitter, goodnight internet!
|
|
|
Dani3l3:
so how do yuo "authenticate" yonky instances with each other - WITHOUT introducing a new SPOF?
|
|
|
Dani3l3:
plus you would need to have a way for the instances to notify each other... like trackbacks in blogs - but spam is an issue with that
|
|
|
Dani3l3:
Gravataror buddy icon is a good start. But all instances should use a common way to authenticate people - such as LiveID or OpenID
replies (1) |
|
|
Dani3l3:
I have a few ideas but they all have pro's and con's
|
|
|
Dani3l3:
i just thought any site implementing an "instance" of yonky-OSS could be made "aware" of other "instances"... but the challenge is *HOW*
|
|
|
Dani3l3:
the threaded view is getting mixed up with two conversations (mail + identity): http://yonkly.com/link/7UINB
replies (1) |
|
|
Dani3l3:
...this could be a protoptype of federated identity...
replies (1) |
|
|
Dani3l3:
...just like it happened with blogs. But pingbacks and trackbacks are fundamentally broken...
|
|
|
Dani3l3:
well I mean: there are tons of clones. the GOOD point of releasing a CODE of this kind is that people will use their own instance of it...
|
|
haacked:
Testing
|
|
|
haacked:
Just trying it out.
replies (1) |
|
|
Dani3l3:
which will in a way resolve the issue with twitter being "centralized". but we need some way to "link" those instances together...
|
|
|
Dani3l3:
if yonkly is going to be released as open source, it is possible that people will install their own "instance" of it, right ?
replies (1) |
|
|
Dani3l3:
it might be something related to the SMTP server configuration, if it works on your dev machine... not the code then! :-)
|
|
|
Dani3l3:
it's not that the mails are getting into junk. it is your web app that said "i can't send you mail" - but I could log in fine with my pwd
replies (1) |